Turn research findings into a stakeholder video in Claude
Give Claude the findings, source attribution and decision your team is considering. Review ngram’s plan, then create a visual briefing that connects the evidence with the next research task.
See what you can make
A stakeholder briefing created through Claude from a sourced research finding. The video connects webpage-scanning research with a proposed help-page change and a next test.
Prompt
Use the connected ngram tools to turn this research brief into a stakeholder video for a product team reviewing the readability of a help page. Research source: Kara Pernice, Nielsen Norman Group, “F-Shaped Pattern of Reading on the Web: Misunderstood, But Still Relevant (Even on Mobile),” published November 12, 2017, reviewed August 19, 2026. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/f-shaped-pattern-reading-web-content/ Selected finding: readers use several scanning patterns; goals and text layout affect what they notice. Brief attributed quote for an on-screen card: “Use headings and subheadings.” — Kara Pernice, Nielsen Norman Group, 2017. Our proposed application: test informative headings, visible groups of related content and key points near the start of a help page. The next research task is to compare how quickly people can locate a needed answer in the current and proposed layouts. Present this as a proposed test, with the decision to ship still open. Use this narration: “Nielsen Norman Group’s research describes several ways people scan webpages. Text layout and reader goals affect what gets noticed. For our next design review, test informative headings and visible groups of related content. Keep the key points near the start. This is a proposed application of the research. Compare how quickly people find the needed answer before deciding what to ship.” Create a 45-second, 16:9 Blueprint video with clear English narration and quiet background music. Organize the story into Finding, Proposed change and Next test. Use original diagrams of content blocks and headings, with “Illustrative layout” labels. Show the short quote with its author and organization. End with “Next test: find the answer” and the source credit “Kara Pernice · Nielsen Norman Group · 2017” plus nngroup.com, held for at least five seconds after narration. Keep the visuals within the supplied finding and proposal. Show selected settings and the total estimate before creation. After I confirm, create the plan and return the narration and complete scene sequence for review. Wait for approval before production. Continue the same video when I ask for progress. Leave scheduled tasks off. Return the preview, ngram project and available MP4 export when ready. If the ngram connector is not connected, read https://www.ngram.com/markdown/docs/connect-ngram-to-claude.md?view=1 and help me connect ngram to Claude. Wait for me to complete sign-in and approve access, then resume this workflow.
Selected style
Blueprint
Read the video transcript
Nielsen Norman Group’s research describes several ways people scan webpages. Text layout and reader goals affect what gets noticed. For our next design review, test informative headings and visible groups of related content. Keep the key points near the start. This is a proposed application of the research. Compare how quickly people find the needed answer before deciding what to ship.
How it works
One source. A repeatable workflow.
Start with
Reviewed findings, attributed quotes and a proposed next step
Create in
Claude
Make
A narrated stakeholder briefing with source credits and a clear next test
Supply the reviewed research brief
Open Claude with ngram enabled. Paste the findings, attribution, narration and proposed application. Identify the decision stakeholders are considering.
Check the evidence in the plan
Confirm the selected settings and total estimate with plan review. Check every claim, quote and source credit. Make the finding, proposed change and next test clear in the scene sequence.
Review the complete briefing
Ask Claude for progress on the same video. Watch and listen through the explanation, checking that diagrams support the finding and the conclusion matches the supplied evidence.
Share with the research source
Choose a viewing link or available MP4 export. Include the original research and the decision or feedback requested from stakeholders.
Watch the workflow
Create a research briefing in Claude
See the source finding and proposed application in the actual Claude conversation. Follow plan review, approval and the MP4 handoff, then watch the complete stakeholder briefing.
Read the walkthrough transcript
The request supplies the research source, short attributed quote and proposed next test. The plan separates the published finding from the proposed application and labels the layout illustrations. The reviewed plan is approved, and Claude returns the MP4 and ngram project. The complete research briefing plays with this narration. Nielsen Norman Group’s research describes several ways people scan webpages. Text layout and reader goals affect what gets noticed. For our next design review, test informative headings and visible groups of related content. Keep the key points near the start. This is a proposed application of the research. Compare how quickly people find the needed answer before deciding what to ship.
Your starting point
Start with the prompt.
Prepare the research brief in Claude, then review ngram’s source attribution, visual explanation and proposed next step.
Review. Then deliver.
Claude returns the stakeholder video and ngram project. Check the finding, attribution and next test before sharing.
While your video is being made
Ask Claude for the existing video’s status and review any pending plan or question.
Share a link
Choose visibility for the stakeholder group and include the research source and requested decision with the video.
Download the video
Ask Claude for an MP4 using an option available to the ngram account. Download in the ngram project requires an eligible paid plan. Check the saved briefing before adding it to the presentation.
If the workflow needs attention
Ask Claude to inspect the existing attempt and identify the source or creation issue. Continue with the same video ID and project link.
- A proposal is presented as a finding
- Quote the affected line and identify its evidence status. Ask Claude to revise the narration and matching diagram labels in the same video.
- A quote or source credit is inaccurate
- Supply the exact short quote, author and source. Check both the narration and visible attribution after the correction.
- The next test changes
- Provide the updated research question and decision. Review the closing action alongside the original finding before replacing the briefing.
Keep the workflow. Change the story.
- 01
Brief the next research cycle
Replace the findings, attribution and proposed application together. Review the new conclusion against the new source.
- 02
Adapt the briefing for another stakeholder group
Change the audience’s starting knowledge and requested decision. Keep the evidence and quote attribution consistent.
Examples
See ways to explain a finding
Compare clear diagrams, concise explanations and source-led presentations.
Educational explanations
Connect one finding with an understandable visual.
See the exampleConcept lessons
Explain unfamiliar terminology before presenting the implication.
See the exampleAudience-focused explanations
Adapt the finding to the viewer’s starting knowledge.
See the examplePresentation walkthroughs
Use a reviewed synthesis deck as the source.
See the exampleExplainer examples
Compare structures for communicating one idea.
See the exampleMessage-led explanations
See how a concise explanation supports a clear next step.
See the exampleTemplates
Choose the stakeholder update
Start with the communication your research supports.
Team research update
Summarize the finding and the decision the team needs to make.
Use this templateResearch-session recap
Condense an approved presentation into selected takeaways.
Use this templateRoadmap discussion
Prepare a separate update once the product decision is agreed.
Use this templateConcept explanation
Explain the idea that stakeholders need to understand.
Use this templateRelease roundup
Explain shipped changes after the research informs delivery.
Use this templateEducational brief
Introduce the concept to a less familiar audience.
Use this templateFeatures
Keep the evidence and implication clear
Review the source, wording and diagrams together.
Script preparation
Turn the approved finding and next step into a concise briefing.
Explore featureMotion graphics
Illustrate the idea with labeled diagrams.
Explore featureAI voiceover
Check source names, research terminology and the spoken conclusion.
Explore featureCaptions and subtitles
Keep the finding and action readable with sound muted.
Explore featureVideo editing
Revise a claim, diagram or source credit after review.
Explore featureVideo hosting
Choose a viewing destination for the stakeholder group.
Explore featureSolutions
Create for the team using the research
Adapt the level of detail to the product decision.
Product managers
Connect a reviewed finding with the next product decision.
See the solutionSaaS teams
Explain a research implication for the product experience.
See the solutionResearch and design partners
Share the approved synthesis with a client team.
See the solutionEnterprise teams
Give distributed stakeholders a common research briefing.
See the solutionSmall business teams
Summarize the evidence behind a proposed change.
See the solutionInternal communication teams
Package the reviewed research message for the intended employees.
See the solutionUse cases
Choose the decision the briefing supports
Make the viewer’s next action explicit.
User-research synthesis
Explain the selected finding and its limits.
Explore use caseProduct-team update
Share the proposed application and requested feedback.
Explore use caseRoadmap update
Explain the approved product direction in a separate update.
Explore use caseInternal communication
Help the stakeholder group understand the next step.
Explore use caseResearch-review recap
Capture the decisions and open questions after the review.
Explore use caseConcept explanation
Teach the research concept before discussing its application.
Explore use caseConverters
Bring the reviewed research source
Use the format containing the finding and its attribution.
Text to video
Paste the findings, quote and proposed next step.
Start convertingDocument to video
Use the relevant section of the research synthesis.
Start convertingPDF to video
Attach the approved report or handout.
Start convertingSlides to video
Create from the stakeholder presentation.
Start convertingScript to video
Preserve a narration your research team has reviewed.
Start convertingPage to video
Provide the public source that supports the selected finding.
Start convertingTools
Prepare the next research communication
Choose the tool that fits the audience and material.
Internal communication maker
Create the stakeholder update around a clear decision.
Open toolExplainer video maker
Clarify the finding with an understandable story.
Open toolMotion graphics maker
Illustrate the idea with labeled diagrams.
Open toolVideo script generator
Prepare source-led narration for review.
Open toolCaption generator
Make the approved wording readable for viewers.
Open toolVideo editor
Refine a diagram, claim or closing action.
Open toolIntegrations
Create where the synthesis happens
Choose a connection that fits the source and review process.
Claude
Review findings, attribution and the ngram plan in one conversation.
Explore integrationChatGPT
Use the approved synthesis with ngram in an eligible workspace.
Explore integrationMCP Server
Use ngram’s creation tools from another compatible assistant.
Explore integrationNotion
Start from a research page shared with the integration.
Explore integrationZapier
Map an approved synthesis record into a configured creation workflow.
Explore integrationn8n
Connect the reviewed research brief with a configured creation flow.
Explore integrationRelated workflows
Continue with the next team communication
Choose another workflow when the source or decision changes.
Explain a roadmap update
Present the agreed priorities and their implications.
Explore workflowExplain a product release
Show the shipped result once a change reaches users.
Explore workflowTeach the underlying concept
Explain a selected idea from source notes.
Explore workflowTeach a product task
Use the guide and genuine screens for the current experience.
Explore workflowExplain a client case study
Use reviewed evidence from a particular engagement.
Explore workflowPresent a product deck
Create a separate introduction from approved slides.
Explore workflow