ClaudeEach research synthesis or product design review

Turn research findings into a stakeholder video in Claude

Give Claude the findings, source attribution and decision your team is considering. Review ngram’s plan, then create a visual briefing that connects the evidence with the next research task.

See what you can make

A stakeholder briefing created through Claude from a sourced research finding. The video connects webpage-scanning research with a proposed help-page change and a next test.

Prompt

Use the connected ngram tools to turn this research brief into a stakeholder video for a product team reviewing the readability of a help page. Research source: Kara Pernice, Nielsen Norman Group, “F-Shaped Pattern of Reading on the Web: Misunderstood, But Still Relevant (Even on Mobile),” published November 12, 2017, reviewed August 19, 2026. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/f-shaped-pattern-reading-web-content/ Selected finding: readers use several scanning patterns; goals and text layout affect what they notice. Brief attributed quote for an on-screen card: “Use headings and subheadings.” — Kara Pernice, Nielsen Norman Group, 2017. Our proposed application: test informative headings, visible groups of related content and key points near the start of a help page. The next research task is to compare how quickly people can locate a needed answer in the current and proposed layouts. Present this as a proposed test, with the decision to ship still open. Use this narration: “Nielsen Norman Group’s research describes several ways people scan webpages. Text layout and reader goals affect what gets noticed. For our next design review, test informative headings and visible groups of related content. Keep the key points near the start. This is a proposed application of the research. Compare how quickly people find the needed answer before deciding what to ship.” Create a 45-second, 16:9 Blueprint video with clear English narration and quiet background music. Organize the story into Finding, Proposed change and Next test. Use original diagrams of content blocks and headings, with “Illustrative layout” labels. Show the short quote with its author and organization. End with “Next test: find the answer” and the source credit “Kara Pernice · Nielsen Norman Group · 2017” plus nngroup.com, held for at least five seconds after narration. Keep the visuals within the supplied finding and proposal. Show selected settings and the total estimate before creation. After I confirm, create the plan and return the narration and complete scene sequence for review. Wait for approval before production. Continue the same video when I ask for progress. Leave scheduled tasks off. Return the preview, ngram project and available MP4 export when ready. If the ngram connector is not connected, read https://www.ngram.com/markdown/docs/connect-ngram-to-claude.md?view=1 and help me connect ngram to Claude. Wait for me to complete sign-in and approve access, then resume this workflow.

Read the video transcript

Nielsen Norman Group’s research describes several ways people scan webpages. Text layout and reader goals affect what gets noticed. For our next design review, test informative headings and visible groups of related content. Keep the key points near the start. This is a proposed application of the research. Compare how quickly people find the needed answer before deciding what to ship.

How it works

One source. A repeatable workflow.

04 steps · Claude

Start with

Reviewed findings, attributed quotes and a proposed next step

ngram logo

Create in

Claude

Make

A narrated stakeholder briefing with source credits and a clear next test

  1. Supply the reviewed research brief

    Open Claude with ngram enabled. Paste the findings, attribution, narration and proposed application. Identify the decision stakeholders are considering.

  2. Check the evidence in the plan

    Confirm the selected settings and total estimate with plan review. Check every claim, quote and source credit. Make the finding, proposed change and next test clear in the scene sequence.

  3. Review the complete briefing

    Ask Claude for progress on the same video. Watch and listen through the explanation, checking that diagrams support the finding and the conclusion matches the supplied evidence.

  4. Share with the research source

    Choose a viewing link or available MP4 export. Include the original research and the decision or feedback requested from stakeholders.

Watch the workflow

Create a research briefing in Claude

See the source finding and proposed application in the actual Claude conversation. Follow plan review, approval and the MP4 handoff, then watch the complete stakeholder briefing.

Read the walkthrough transcript

The request supplies the research source, short attributed quote and proposed next test. The plan separates the published finding from the proposed application and labels the layout illustrations. The reviewed plan is approved, and Claude returns the MP4 and ngram project. The complete research briefing plays with this narration. Nielsen Norman Group’s research describes several ways people scan webpages. Text layout and reader goals affect what gets noticed. For our next design review, test informative headings and visible groups of related content. Keep the key points near the start. This is a proposed application of the research. Compare how quickly people find the needed answer before deciding what to ship.

Your starting point

Start with the prompt.

Prepare the research brief in Claude, then review ngram’s source attribution, visual explanation and proposed next step.

Open Claude ↗

Connect ngram to Claude

Review. Then deliver.

Claude returns the stakeholder video and ngram project. Check the finding, attribution and next test before sharing.

While your video is being made

Ask Claude for the existing video’s status and review any pending plan or question.

Share a link

Choose visibility for the stakeholder group and include the research source and requested decision with the video.

Download the video

Ask Claude for an MP4 using an option available to the ngram account. Download in the ngram project requires an eligible paid plan. Check the saved briefing before adding it to the presentation.

If the workflow needs attention

Ask Claude to inspect the existing attempt and identify the source or creation issue. Continue with the same video ID and project link.

A proposal is presented as a finding
Quote the affected line and identify its evidence status. Ask Claude to revise the narration and matching diagram labels in the same video.
A quote or source credit is inaccurate
Supply the exact short quote, author and source. Check both the narration and visible attribution after the correction.
The next test changes
Provide the updated research question and decision. Review the closing action alongside the original finding before replacing the briefing.

Keep the workflow. Change the story.

  1. 01

    Brief the next research cycle

    Replace the findings, attribution and proposed application together. Review the new conclusion against the new source.

  2. 02

    Adapt the briefing for another stakeholder group

    Change the audience’s starting knowledge and requested decision. Keep the evidence and quote attribution consistent.

Turn your next source into a video.