Win the deal with a 90-second video instead of a 15-page battle card

Turn your competitive intel into a competitive comparison video reps drop in chat during live calls. Same positioning every time, updated in fifteen minutes when the rival ships a new feature.

Or pick a video type to get started

Trusted by teams at

Salesforce
Salesforce
HubSpot
HubSpot
PayPal
PayPal
Snap Inc.
Snap Inc.
Rocket Mortgage
Rocket Mortgage
Tektronix
Tektronix
Diligent
Diligent
Times Internet
Times Internet
Fivetran
Fivetran
Demandbase
Demandbase
Salesforce
Salesforce
HubSpot
HubSpot
PayPal
PayPal
Snap Inc.
Snap Inc.
Rocket Mortgage
Rocket Mortgage
Tektronix
Tektronix
Diligent
Diligent
Times Internet
Times Internet
Fivetran
Fivetran
Demandbase
Demandbase
Eightfold AI
Eightfold AI
PingCAP
PingCAP
Quizizz
Quizizz
Apryse
Apryse
Sandbox VR
Sandbox VR
Improvado
Improvado
Taggbox
Taggbox
Matrixport
Matrixport
Glasswall
Glasswall
ContractSafe
ContractSafe
Eightfold AI
Eightfold AI
PingCAP
PingCAP
Quizizz
Quizizz
Apryse
Apryse
Sandbox VR
Sandbox VR
Improvado
Improvado
Taggbox
Taggbox
Matrixport
Matrixport
Glasswall
Glasswall
ContractSafe
ContractSafe

Our battle card is a 14-page PDF. Reps wing it on every competitive call.

  1. 9:05am

    Pipeline review. Three of the seven open deals mention the same competitor. Sales asks if there is a comparison video yet. Marketing says there is a 14-page battle card in Confluence — last touched four months ago.

  2. 11:20am

    AE on a live discovery call. Prospect says "we are also evaluating Competitor X." The rep blanks on differentiator number three, mixes up which limitation belongs to which rival, and offers to send materials over.

  3. 2:14pm

    Post-call. AE searches the drive, finds the PDF, attaches it to a follow-up email. The prospect downloads it, glances at page one in the preview pane, and never opens the file again.

  4. 4:30pm

    Product marketing scopes a fresh competitive video with an agency. Quote: nine thousand dollars, four weeks to deliver, no in-flight revisions. CFO asks for an ROI model before the SOW gets signed.

  5. +14 days

    Competitor ships a pricing change. Whatever script was in motion is now wrong on two slides. Three live deals are stalling because the rep cannot answer the new comparison question on the spot.

  6. +28 days

    Deal lost. Win/loss interview reveals the competitor sent a tight 90-second walkthrough during the eval call. Your battle card never got opened. The deck dies on a shared drive.

70%

of B2B buyers prefer a short comparison video to a written feature grid. Most teams cannot turn intel around fast enough, so the battle card sits unread in Confluence while the rep improvises on the call.

And the one rep who knows the deck by heart just left for the competitor.

From "let me find that battle card" to "watch this 90-second breakdown"

The old way
Before ngram
The ngram way
After ngram

A prospect mentions a competitor on the call. The AE stumbles through three differentiators, mixes up which rival has which gap, and promises to send the battle card. The PDF arrives in a follow-up email and never gets opened.

Same competitor mention. The AE drops a 90-second competitive comparison video into the chat: "This shows how we compare on the three things you said matter most." The prospect watches it on the second monitor while you keep talking.

Product marketing rewrites the battle card every quarter. By the time the new version is approved, two competitors have shipped new pricing tiers and one shipped a redesigned UI. The PDF is stale on the day it ships.

When the rival changes pricing on Tuesday, you swap the pricing scene on Wednesday morning and re-render. The competitive comparison video stays accurate inside the same week. Every rep is selling against the current rival, not last quarter's rival.

Ten reps tell ten different competitive stories. Some lead with security, some lead with price, some forget the landmine question entirely. Win rates against the top two competitors stay flat all year.

Every rep on the team sends the same video in the same deal stage. Positioning lands the same way on the CFO call as it does on the IT review. Win rates against the named rivals climb because the message finally arrives intact.

Time to create
Under 30 min
was: 3-4 weeks with an agency
Cost per rival
$0 extra
was: $5,000-$15,000 per agency cut
Time to update
Under 15 min
was: New brief, new revision cycle
Rep adoption
Sent in chat
was: PDF that never gets opened

A competitive comparison video from what your battle card already has

Bring the walkthrough you already record, or paste the battle card you already wrote. ngram drops either input into the same script, storyboard, and brand-kit pipeline — and gives you a video reps will actually send in the deal.

1Path one
Drop a walkthrough recording
.mov · .mp4 · 4:32 typical

Record a quick competitive walkthrough

Open the screen recorder. Walk through your top three differentiators while toggling between your product and the comparison frame. ngram cuts the dead air, adds smart zooms on every click, layers captions, and stitches branded transitions between rivals.

Screen Recording to Video
2Path twoMost popular
Paste the battle card
positioning doc · win/loss notes

Or paste the battle card text

Paste your battle card, positioning doc, or win/loss notes. ngram writes the script in problem-differentiator-proof-close shape, plans the comparison visuals, and assembles a complete video with AI voiceover and motion graphics. Review the storyboard before render.

Docs to Video
ngram

One competitive comparison video

Polished, branded, on-message — the same 90 seconds every rep can drop into chat the moment a rival's name surfaces.

smart zoomscaptionsbrand kit

Already have a battle card in slides? Run PPT to Video first, then iterate the comparison scenes in the storyboard — same pipeline either way.

What changes when competitive comparison video is a sprint, not a project

Every rival gets its own current video

Top benefit

Stop triaging which competitors deserve content. Build a competitive video per named rival, refresh the scene that moved when their roadmap moves, and ship to the sales floor before the next pipeline review.

Sales reps using personalized competitive video see roughly 3× higher reply rates than reps sending the same battle-card PDF in the follow-up email. Same intel, different package — the format does the work.

Intel that never goes stale

Competitor ships a pricing change Tuesday. Swap the pricing scene Wednesday morning and re-render. Your competitive content tracks the rival's roadmap instead of lagging it by a quarter.

Every rep sells the same story

Same positioning lands in the CFO call, the IT review, and the buyer kickoff. The win/loss interview stops surfacing "the rep got the comparison wrong" as a deal-killer.

Battle card → comparison video in 3 steps

1

Drop in your competitive intel

30 seconds

Paste the battle card, attach the win/loss notes, or upload a quick walkthrough recording. ngram works with whatever format your competitive intel already lives in — no clean source required.

2

Review the comparison narrative

2 minutes

ngram structures your positioning into problem, differentiators, proof, and close. Reorder the scenes, tighten the differentiator copy, or approve the storyboard as drafted before render.

3

Render and arm the sales floor

instant

Pull the MP4 in 16:9 for sales calls plus a 1:1 for LinkedIn enablement posts. Embed the link in your CRM playbook so the right video is one click away the next time the rival's name comes up.

Built for the job

Built for competitive comparison video, specifically

Explore all features
Built for teams

Who ships competitive content in your company?

All solutions

Explore more use cases

Other competitive and revenue-adjacent video plays teams build alongside their rival-by-rival comparison library.

View all use cases
Starting from something else?

You don't need a recording to make a comparison.

Bring the asset your competitive intel already lives in. Each converter drops you into the same script, storyboard, and brand-kit pipeline the recording flow uses.

The rest of the toolkit

Every tool the competitive content pipeline runs on.

All ngram tools

The old way vs. the ngram way

Static Battle CardsVideo Agencyngram
Time to first comparison video2-4 hours writing3-4 weeks per cutUnder 30 minutes
Cost per rivalStaff time only$5,000-$15,000 per cutIncluded in plan
Time to update when rival changesHours of rewritingWeeks plus revision feesUnder 15 minutes
Rep adoption in live dealsLow (PDF sits unread)Moderate (watched once)High (dropped in chat)
Rival coverageTop 3 only1-2 per budget cycleEvery named rival in pipeline
Integrations

Wire competitive content into the revenue stack you already run.

Each integration ships with a working template. Trigger a comparison refresh from a CRM stage, a competitive intel alert, or a chat agent — or build your own with the REST API.

REST APIMCP serverWebhooksBuild your own integration in ~30 lines.

“But will it work for my situation?”

Still have questions?

Your next competitive deal is 90 seconds away

Stop losing deals to reps who improvise the competitive story. Stop waiting weeks for agency comparison cuts. Ship a current competitive comparison video per named rival, refresh it the day the rival's roadmap moves, and arm the floor.