A video bug report that gets fixed on the first try

Stop writing video bug reports that bounce back as "cannot reproduce." Record 30 seconds of the broken flow, let ngram add smart zooms and step labels, and hand engineering a clip they can act on inside the same standup.

Or pick a video type to get started

Trusted by teams at

Salesforce
Salesforce
HubSpot
HubSpot
PayPal
PayPal
Snap Inc.
Snap Inc.
Rocket Mortgage
Rocket Mortgage
Tektronix
Tektronix
Diligent
Diligent
Times Internet
Times Internet
Fivetran
Fivetran
Demandbase
Demandbase
Salesforce
Salesforce
HubSpot
HubSpot
PayPal
PayPal
Snap Inc.
Snap Inc.
Rocket Mortgage
Rocket Mortgage
Tektronix
Tektronix
Diligent
Diligent
Times Internet
Times Internet
Fivetran
Fivetran
Demandbase
Demandbase
Eightfold AI
Eightfold AI
PingCAP
PingCAP
Quizizz
Quizizz
Apryse
Apryse
Sandbox VR
Sandbox VR
Improvado
Improvado
Taggbox
Taggbox
Matrixport
Matrixport
Glasswall
Glasswall
ContractSafe
ContractSafe
Eightfold AI
Eightfold AI
PingCAP
PingCAP
Quizizz
Quizizz
Apryse
Apryse
Sandbox VR
Sandbox VR
Improvado
Improvado
Taggbox
Taggbox
Matrixport
Matrixport
Glasswall
Glasswall
ContractSafe
ContractSafe

Cannot reproduce. Can you provide more details?" — for the third Jira reply in a row.

  1. Tuesday 10:14am

    Sprint review. You spot the checkout flow breaking on a pasted promo code with trailing spaces. You take a screenshot of the error toast and file the bug in Jira with three steps to reproduce. Priority: medium.

  2. Wednesday 3:42pm

    The engineer assigned to the ticket types the promo code manually. Works fine. They post in the thread: "Cannot reproduce. Browser? Did you copy from email or a spreadsheet? Send the exact string." You're in a roadmap review and don't see the message.

  3. Thursday 9:18am

    You reply with partial answers. Chrome. Pasted from Google Sheets. You guess the string from memory. The engineer tries again. Still works. They ask whether the user was logged in, on which plan, and from which country. The bug is on its fourth round-trip.

  4. Friday 4:55pm

    The ticket is still open. Two other PMs filed adjacent bugs in the same flow and engineering has triaged none of them because yours is blocking the lane. Standup on Monday will start with the same status — "need more info from PM."

  5. Following Wednesday

    You finally hop on a Zoom and screen-share the bug. The engineer spots the trailing whitespace from the spreadsheet copy in five seconds. The fix lands the same afternoon. A week of latency for a detail you didn't think mattered.

  6. Next sprint planning

    Engineering proposes a "no bug ticket without a repro video" rule. You agree. Then it's 11pm and you're trying to learn iMovie just to add an arrow to the right field. The rule lasts three tickets before everyone reverts.

30-45 min

of engineering time disappears into each incomplete bug ticket — multiply across a sprint and a meaningful slice of the team's velocity vanishes into clarification threads instead of fixes.

And the engineer is right. The bug needed paste, not type. I never wrote that down.

From "cannot reproduce" to "fixed in the next commit"

The old way
Before ngram
The ngram way
After ngram

Three rounds of clarification across two timezones, one Zoom share, one week of latency, and a fix that ships behind the next sprint's stretch goals. The same bug that took five seconds to spot in person took five days to actually reproduce in code.

The engineer watches a 25-second video bug report on their phone before standup. They reproduce the bug on the first attempt. The fix lands in the next commit. No clarification thread, no Zoom share, no follow-up sprint.

You spend the back half of every sprint defending old tickets — re-explaining context, re-running steps over a Loom share, hunting for the exact browser version. The PM job stops being roadmap work and starts being bug-translation work.

You file the bug at 10:15am. The clip auto-zooms on the paste, labels the steps, and burns a caption over the error. You go back to roadmap planning. The fix lands before the afternoon coffee, no message thread, no context switch.

Edge cases stay open for weeks because the written steps don't capture timing, hover state, or the order of operations. Engineering closes them as "works as designed" — and the bug shows up again in next quarter's churn analysis.

The video makes the timing and the order obvious. Hover state shows on the recording. The bug gets the priority it earned because engineering trusts the ticket the moment they open it.

Reproduction success
~95% first try
was: ~50% with text-only reports
PM time per bug
Under 2 min
was: 30-45 min spread across the week
Clarification rounds
Zero
was: 3-5 message round-trips
Time to first fix
Same day
was: Days to weeks

Clear video bug reports from whatever you just captured

Bring a fresh recording or an old Loom that nobody could parse. Either input lands in the same zoom, label, and trim pipeline.

1Path oneMost popular
Drop a screen recording
.mov · .mp4 · ~01:30

Record while you reproduce the bug

Hit record the moment you spot the bug. Click through the reproduction steps, show the broken state, narrate what should have happened. ngram auto-zooms on every click, drops numbered step labels at each action, trims the dead air, and burns captions from your narration before the next standup.

Screen Recording to Video
2Path two
Drop a Loom or QuickTime file
.mp4 · .mov · screen capture

Or polish an existing Loom or capture

Already have an unedited Loom or QuickTime capture of the bug? Drop it in. ngram adds callouts at the moment of failure, inserts text annotations for expected-vs-actual, trims to the relevant 20-30 seconds, and turns a meandering capture into something engineering trusts on the first open.

Video Converter
ngram

One video bug report engineering can act on

Numbered steps. Smart zooms on every click. Captions from your narration. A 25-second clip that survives a Jira description box.

smart zoomscaptionsmotion graphics

Already shipping bug repro from a meeting recording or a webinar? Run it through Audio to Video or Webinar to Clips first — the polish step downstream is identical.

What changes when video bug reports take 2 minutes

The triage queue stops being half clarification

Top benefit

Engineers reproduce the bug on the first attempt. The PM stops context-switching back to tickets from last week. Sprint velocity climbs because the team spends fix-time on fixing, not on chasing down details the text report should have included.

First try

Teams switching to video bug reports consistently report engineers reproducing roughly 9 out of 10 issues without a follow-up message — closing the loop in one ticket instead of three.

Fixes ship same-day, not same-sprint

When reproduction takes seconds instead of days, the fix lands in the next commit. The week-long async loop where the bug sits open across timezones simply doesn't start. Triage queues clear faster every week.

The PM becomes the engineer's favorite filer

Engineers stop bracing when they see your ticket. They start opening your bugs first because they know your reports are actionable. That credibility compounds — your roadmap asks start landing easier too.

Spotted bug → fixed in the next commit in 3 steps

1

Record the reproduction

30 seconds

Hit record. Walk through the steps that trigger the bug — including the paste, the hover, the exact sequence. Wrong clicks and setup time are fine; ngram will trim them.

2

Review the polished report

2 minutes

ngram zooms on each click, drops numbered step labels at every action, trims the preamble, and burns captions from your narration. Tweak any callout — "Expected: redirect; Actual: 500 error" — before exporting.

3

Attach to Jira, Linear, or GitHub

instant

Export the MP4 or grab a /watch link with the caption transcript inline. Drop it into the ticket and move on. Engineers reproduce the bug on the first attempt; the thread stays empty.

Built for the job

Built for video bug reports, specifically

Explore all features
Built for teams

Who files bugs in your product org?

All solutions

Explore more use cases

Other ways product managers use ngram to keep the sprint moving without staging-only walkthroughs that turn into hour-long screen shares.

View all use cases
Starting from something else?

Not every video bug report starts with a fresh recording.

Bring whatever asset captured the failure. Each converter drops you into the same zoom, label, and trim pipeline the live-recording flow uses.

The rest of the toolkit

Every tool the bug-report pipeline runs on.

All ngram tools

The old way vs. the ngram way

Text-only TicketsRaw Loom / Capturengram
First-try reproduction rate~50%~65%~95%
Time to create the report10-15 min writing30 sec (unedited)2 min (polished)
Clarification rounds3-5 per ticket1-2 per ticketZero
Context capturedText only (gaps)Raw video (no emphasis)Zoomed, labeled, captioned
Searchability after the fixCopy-paste stepsReshare raw linkSearchable transcript + clip
Integrations

Wire video bug reports into the tracker you already triage on.

Each integration ships with a working recipe. Trigger a polished video bug report from a tracker move, a tool call, or a chat agent — or build your own with the REST API.

Zapier
no-code

whenA new screen recording lands in /bug-reports/inbox or a Jira ticket gets the 'needs-video' label

thenRender the polished video bug report and attach the MP4 + /watch link back to the ticket

Integrate with Zapier
MCP Server
agentic

whenClaude or ChatGPT calls the bug-report tool with a failing API trace or a screen recording URL

thenReturn a finished video bug report with step labels, captioned narration, and a hosted /watch link

Integrate with MCP Server
Chrome Extension
browser

whenYou hit 'Bug video' on the tab where the bug is reproducing right now

thenGet a polished video bug report back in a new tab inside two minutes — ready to drop into Jira

Integrate with Chrome Extension
Make.com
scenarios

whenA new bug ticket lands in Linear with priority 'urgent' and no attached repro

thenGenerate a follow-up reminder + pre-baked bug-report storyboard for the reporting PM to fill in

Integrate with Make.com
n8n
self-host

whenA self-hosted error tracker (Sentry, GlitchTip, Highlight) fires a critical alert

thenAuto-generate a video bug report from the captured session replay on your own VPC

Integrate with n8n
LinkedIn
publish

whenA bug-report video gets sanitized for a customer-facing changelog post-fix

thenSchedule the cleaned-up 'how we caught this' clip to the engineering blog or LinkedIn page

Integrate with LinkedIn
X (Twitter)
publish

whenA user-facing bug fix is announced publicly

thenSchedule the before/after social variant showing the fix, with copy A/B and a thread reply teed up

Integrate with X (Twitter)
YouTube
publish

whenA post-mortem video on a high-severity bug needs to live on the engineering channel

thenUpload the long-form repro + fix walkthrough with chapter markers per sprint phase

Integrate with YouTube
REST APIMCP serverWebhooksBuild your own integration in ~30 lines.

“But will it work for my situation?”

Still have questions?

Your next bug report takes two minutes not two days

Record the bug. Let ngram add the zooms, the step labels, and the captioned narration. Drop the polished video bug report into Jira, Linear, or GitHub — and watch the fix ship inside the same standup.