PM Bug Report

Bug reports that get fixed on the first try

Stop writing bug reports that bounce back as "cannot reproduce." Record a 30-second video, let ngram add smart zooms and step labels, and hand engineers a bug report they can actually act on.

Or pick a video type to get started

Trusted by teams at

Salesforce
Salesforce
HubSpot
HubSpot
PayPal
PayPal
Snap Inc.
Snap Inc.
Rocket Mortgage
Rocket Mortgage
Tektronix
Tektronix
Diligent
Diligent
Times Internet
Times Internet
Fivetran
Fivetran
Demandbase
Demandbase
Salesforce
Salesforce
HubSpot
HubSpot
PayPal
PayPal
Snap Inc.
Snap Inc.
Rocket Mortgage
Rocket Mortgage
Tektronix
Tektronix
Diligent
Diligent
Times Internet
Times Internet
Fivetran
Fivetran
Demandbase
Demandbase
Eightfold AI
Eightfold AI
PingCAP
PingCAP
Quizizz
Quizizz
Apryse
Apryse
Sandbox VR
Sandbox VR
Improvado
Improvado
Taggbox
Taggbox
Matrixport
Matrixport
Glasswall
Glasswall
ContractSafe
ContractSafe
Eightfold AI
Eightfold AI
PingCAP
PingCAP
Quizizz
Quizizz
Apryse
Apryse
Sandbox VR
Sandbox VR
Improvado
Improvado
Taggbox
Taggbox
Matrixport
Matrixport
Glasswall
Glasswall
ContractSafe
ContractSafe

"Cannot reproduce. Can you provide more details?"

You're a product manager juggling sprint planning, stakeholder updates, and a backlog that never shrinks.
You find a bug during testing, open Jira, and write it up: steps to reproduce, expected behavior, actual behavior.
You even attach a screenshot.
You assign it to engineering and move on.

Two days later the ticket bounces back: "Cannot reproduce.
Can you provide more details?" Now you're context-switching back to a bug you already moved past.
You try to remember the exact sequence.
Was it paste or type?
Chrome or Safari?
You rewrite the steps.
Engineering tries again.
Still nothing.

"Cannot reproduce" the most expensive phrase in your bug tracker, according to engineering leads

40% drain of engineering productivity lost to chasing down missing details in vague bug reports

Async death spiral You filed it Tuesday. Engineering asks for clarification Thursday. You reply Monday. The bug sits open for a week.

Invisible context Was it paste or type? Chrome or Firefox? Logged in or logged out? Text can't capture what you can't articulate.

Every "cannot reproduce" costs both sides 30-45 minutes and pushes your fix date further out.

From "cannot reproduce" to "fixed in the next sprint"

The Old Way

Before ngram

The ngram Way

After ngram

You're testing a checkout flow before launch. Something breaks when you paste a promo code with trailing spaces. You file the bug: "Promo code field rejects valid codes when pasted." You attach a screenshot of the error message.
Same bug. This time you hit record, reproduce it in 30 seconds, and drop the recording into ngram. It auto-zooms on your paste action, adds a step label at the error, and trims the dead air. You attach the polished video to Jira.
Engineering types the same code manually. It works fine. They ask: "Which browser? Did you copy from email or a spreadsheet? Can you send the exact string?" You're in back-to-back meetings. You reply the next day with partial answers. They try again, still can't trigger it.
An engineer watches the 25-second clip. They spot the trailing whitespace immediately. They reproduce it on the first attempt. The fix ships in the next commit, not the next sprint.
A week passes. The bug is still open. You finally screen-share on a call. They see it in five seconds: the trailing whitespace from the spreadsheet copy. A detail you didn't think to mention because you didn't realize it mattered. That one missing detail cost both of you a week.
No back-and-forth. No live call. No week-long limbo. You spent two minutes total instead of an hour across five days. The engineer who used to groan at your tickets starts telling other PMs to file bugs like you do.
The Numbers Don't Lie

Time to reproduce

Multiple attempts over days
First attempt after watching video

Back-and-forth messages

3-5 rounds of clarification
Zero (video captures everything)

Time to resolution

Days to weeks
Same day or next commit

PM time per bug

30-45 minutes of clarification
2 minutes (record + polish)

Clear bug reports from whatever you just recorded

ngram turns your raw screen recording of a bug into a polished, annotated video that engineers can follow step-by-step to reproduce any issue on the first try.

1

Record while you reproduce the bug

Hit record the moment you spot the bug. Click through the reproduction steps, show the broken state, and narrate what should have happened. ngram auto-zooms on your clicks, adds step labels at each action, and trims the pauses. Engineers get a clean walkthrough instead of raw footage.

2

Or polish an existing recording

Already have a screen recording or a Loom of the issue? Drop it into ngram. Add callouts highlighting the problem area, insert text annotations for expected vs. actual behavior, and trim to just the relevant 20-30 seconds. Turn an unedited capture into evidence engineers trust.

Most popular

Either way, engineers see exactly what you saw. No guessing from a text description. No follow-up questions. Just bugs that get fixed.

What changes when pm bug report take minutes

Reclaim 30-45 minutes per ticket

No more clarification rounds. No more context-switching back to bugs you filed last week. Engineers watch the video, reproduce the bug, and fix it. You stay focused on roadmap work instead of re-explaining issues.

Eliminate "cannot reproduce" forever

Video captures the invisible context text misses: paste vs. type, hover states, timing, browser quirks. Engineers reproduce bugs on the first try because they watch what happened instead of guessing from a description.

Ship fixes faster, not next sprint

When reproduction takes seconds instead of days, fixes land in the next commit. Bugs that used to linger for weeks across async back-and-forth get resolved before the standup.

Become the PM engineers love working with

Clear bug reports build trust. Engineers stop bracing for incomplete tickets and start prioritizing yours because they know your reports are actionable. That credibility compounds across every sprint.

Raw recording → polished video in 3 steps

1

Record the bug reproduction

30 seconds

Hit record and walk through the steps that trigger the bug. Mistakes, pauses, wrong clicks - all fine. ngram works with whatever you capture.

2

Review the polished report

2 minutes

ngram auto-zooms on your clicks, adds numbered step labels, trims dead air, and generates captions from your narration. Tweak anything in the storyboard before exporting.

3

Attach and move on

instant

Export the video or grab a share link. Drop it into Jira, Linear, or GitHub Issues. Engineers reproduce the bug on the first try. No follow-up needed.

Built for pm bug report, specifically

Cursor Emphasis

Every click in your reproduction is impossible to miss

Every click, scroll, and hover in your bug reproduction gets visually highlighted so engineers can track your exact sequence. No more "where did you click?" follow-ups. The cursor trail makes the reproduction path unmissable.

Learn more
1

Callouts

Numbered steps that engineers follow frame by frame

ngram automatically labels each action in your recording: "Step 1: Paste promo code. Step 2: Click Apply. Step 3: Error appears." Engineers follow numbered steps visually instead of mapping text descriptions to a video timeline.

Learn more
2

Smart Zoom

The bug gets a close-up the moment it appears

When the bug triggers, ngram zooms directly to the error state, the broken UI element, or the unexpected behavior. Engineers see the problem at full resolution without scrubbing through a tiny full-screen recording.

Learn more
3

Auto-Cut

Trim to just the bug, not the preamble

Your raw recording has 90 seconds of setup and 15 seconds of bug. ngram trims to just the reproduction sequence automatically. Engineers watch a tight 20-second clip instead of hunting through a 2-minute recording for the actual issue.

Learn more
4

Auto Captions

Your narration becomes searchable text on every ticket

Your voice narration explaining "this is where it should redirect but instead shows a 500 error" gets transcribed into captions automatically. Engineers understand your context without sound, and the transcript is searchable in your bug tracker.

Learn more
5

“But will it work for my situation?”

Still have questions?

The old way vs. the ngram way

Text-Only Reports
Raw Loom/Recording
ngram Video Reports
Reproduction success rate
~50% first try
~65% first try
~95% first try
Time to create report
10-15 min writing
30 sec (unedited)
2 min (polished)
Back-and-forth rounds
3-5 clarifications
1-2 clarifications
Zero
Context captured
Written only (gaps)
Raw video (no emphasis)
Zoomed, labeled, captioned
Reusability
Copy-paste steps
Reshare raw link
Searchable transcript + video
Ready?

Your next bug report takes
two minutes

not two days

Record the bug. Let ngram add the zooms, labels, and captions. Drop it in Jira. Watch it get fixed on the first try.