Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Lennox International Inc. or AECOM

SG&A Cost Strategies: Lennox vs. AECOM

__timestampAECOMLennox International Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201480908000573700000
Thursday, January 1, 2015113975000580500000
Friday, January 1, 2016115088000621000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017133309000637700000
Monday, January 1, 2018135787000608200000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019148123000585900000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020188535000555900000
Friday, January 1, 2021155072000598900000
Saturday, January 1, 2022147309000627200000
Sunday, January 1, 2023153575000705500000
Monday, January 1, 2024160105000730600000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis compares the SG&A cost optimization strategies of Lennox International Inc. and AECOM from 2014 to 2024. Over this decade, Lennox International Inc. consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 730 million in 2024, a 27% increase from 2014. In contrast, AECOM's SG&A expenses grew by nearly 98% over the same period, reaching around 160 million in 2024. While Lennox's expenses are higher in absolute terms, AECOM's rapid increase suggests a need for more stringent cost control measures. This data highlights the importance of strategic financial management in sustaining long-term growth and competitiveness. As businesses navigate economic fluctuations, optimizing SG&A costs remains a key focus for enhancing operational efficiency and shareholder value.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025