Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Cintas Corporation or TransUnion

Cintas vs. TransUnion: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampCintas CorporationTransUnion
Wednesday, January 1, 20141302752000436000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151224930000499700000
Friday, January 1, 20161348122000560100000
Sunday, January 1, 20171527380000585400000
Monday, January 1, 20181916792000707700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191980644000812100000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202071052000860300000
Friday, January 1, 20211929159000943900000
Saturday, January 1, 202220448760001337400000
Sunday, January 1, 202323707040001171600000
Monday, January 1, 202426177830001239300000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Cintas Corporation and TransUnion, two industry giants, have shown distinct strategies in optimizing these costs over the past decade.

Cintas Corporation: A Steady Climb

From 2014 to 2023, Cintas Corporation has seen a consistent increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $2.37 billion in 2023. This represents an 82% rise from their 2014 figures. Despite the increase, Cintas has maintained a robust growth trajectory, suggesting effective cost management relative to revenue growth.

TransUnion: A Different Path

TransUnion, on the other hand, has experienced a more moderate increase in SG&A expenses, with a notable peak in 2022 at around $1.34 billion. This marks a 207% increase from 2014, indicating a more aggressive expansion strategy.

While Cintas shows a steady and controlled growth in expenses, TransUnion's strategy reflects a more dynamic approach, albeit with some missing data for 2024. The comparison highlights the diverse strategies companies employ to optimize operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025