Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: United Rentals, Inc. vs Fastenal Company

SG&A Expenses: United Rentals vs. Fastenal Over a Decade

__timestampFastenal CompanyUnited Rentals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141110776000758000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151121590000714000000
Friday, January 1, 20161169470000719000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171282800000903000000
Monday, January 1, 201814002000001038000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201914594000001092000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201427400000979000000
Friday, January 1, 202115598000001199000000
Saturday, January 1, 202217622000001400000000
Sunday, January 1, 202318258000001527000000
Monday, January 1, 202418919000001645000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Tale of Two Companies: SG&A Expenses Over a Decade

In the competitive landscape of industrial services, understanding the financial dynamics of key players is crucial. Over the past decade, United Rentals, Inc. and Fastenal Company have showcased intriguing trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, Fastenal's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 70%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and operational strategies. In contrast, United Rentals has seen a more moderate increase of around 117%, indicating a steady growth trajectory.

Key Insights

  • Fastenal's Growth: Fastenal's SG&A expenses grew from 2014's baseline, peaking in 2024, highlighting its strategic investments in infrastructure and market penetration.
  • United Rentals' Strategy: United Rentals, while starting with lower SG&A expenses, has consistently increased its spending, suggesting a focus on scaling operations and enhancing service offerings.

These trends underscore the diverse strategies employed by these industry giants to maintain their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025