Analyzing Cost of Revenue: International Business Machines Corporation and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

IBM vs. FIS: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampFidelity National Information Services, Inc.International Business Machines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014433270000046386000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015439320000041057000000
Friday, January 1, 2016623300000041403000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017579400000042196000000
Monday, January 1, 2018556900000042655000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019661000000026181000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020834800000024314000000
Friday, January 1, 2021868200000025865000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022882000000027842000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023614500000027560000000
Monday, January 1, 2024632300000027202000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: IBM vs. Fidelity National Information Services

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and financial services, understanding cost structures is crucial. From 2014 to 2023, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) have shown distinct trends in their cost of revenue. IBM, a stalwart in the tech industry, saw its cost of revenue decrease by approximately 41% over this period, reflecting strategic shifts and operational efficiencies. In contrast, FIS, a leader in financial services technology, experienced a 44% increase, highlighting its expansion and investment in new technologies.

The data reveals a pivotal moment in 2020 when FIS's cost of revenue surged by 26%, coinciding with global digital transformation trends. Meanwhile, IBM's costs dropped significantly in 2021, aligning with its focus on cloud computing and AI. Notably, 2024 data for FIS is missing, indicating potential reporting delays or strategic changes.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025