Cost of Revenue Comparison: International Business Machines Corporation vs NXP Semiconductors N.V.

IBM vs NXP: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationNXP Semiconductors N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014463860000003007000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015410570000003314000000
Friday, January 1, 2016414030000005429000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017421960000004637000000
Monday, January 1, 2018426550000004556000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019261810000004259000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020243140000004377000000
Friday, January 1, 2021258650000004996000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022278420000005688000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023275600000005723000000
Monday, January 1, 202427202000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, the cost of revenue is a critical metric that reflects a company's operational efficiency. This comparison between International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and NXP Semiconductors N.V. offers a fascinating glimpse into their financial journeys from 2014 to 2023.

IBM's Financial Odyssey

IBM, a stalwart in the tech industry, has seen its cost of revenue fluctuate over the years. Starting at a peak in 2014, IBM's cost of revenue has decreased by approximately 41% by 2023. This decline suggests a strategic shift towards more efficient operations or a change in business focus.

NXP's Steady Climb

In contrast, NXP Semiconductors has experienced a steady increase in its cost of revenue, growing by nearly 90% over the same period. This growth reflects NXP's expanding market presence and investment in innovation.

Missing Data

It's worth noting that data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the dynamic nature of financial reporting.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025