Cost of Revenue Trends: International Business Machines Corporation vs Fair Isaac Corporation

IBM vs FICO: Diverging Cost of Revenue Trends

__timestampFair Isaac CorporationInternational Business Machines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201424928100046386000000
Thursday, January 1, 201527053500041057000000
Friday, January 1, 201626517300041403000000
Sunday, January 1, 201728712300042196000000
Monday, January 1, 201831069900042655000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201933684500026181000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202036114200024314000000
Friday, January 1, 202133246200025865000000
Saturday, January 1, 202230217400027842000000
Sunday, January 1, 202331105300027560000000
Monday, January 1, 202434820600027202000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Cost of Revenue Trends: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and analytics, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) have carved distinct paths. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, IBM's cost of revenue has seen a significant decline of approximately 41%, dropping from 46.4 billion to 27.2 billion. This trend reflects IBM's strategic shift towards more efficient operations and a focus on high-margin services.

Conversely, FICO's cost of revenue has steadily increased by about 40%, from 249 million to 348 million. This growth underscores FICO's expanding footprint in the analytics sector, driven by rising demand for its credit scoring and decision management solutions.

These contrasting trends highlight the dynamic nature of the tech industry, where companies must adapt to changing market demands and technological advancements to maintain their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025