Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for International Business Machines Corporation and Corning Incorporated

IBM vs. Corning: A Decade of Cost of Revenue Trends

__timestampCorning IncorporatedInternational Business Machines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014566300000046386000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015545800000041057000000
Friday, January 1, 2016564400000041403000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017608400000042196000000
Monday, January 1, 2018682900000042655000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019746800000026181000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020777200000024314000000
Friday, January 1, 2021901900000025865000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022968300000027842000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023865700000027560000000
Monday, January 1, 2024884200000027202000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue: A Comparative Analysis of IBM and Corning

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and manufacturing, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for assessing a company's financial health. Over the past decade, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Corning Incorporated have showcased distinct trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2024, IBM's cost of revenue has seen a significant decline, dropping from approximately $46 billion in 2014 to around $27 billion in 2024. This represents a reduction of nearly 41%, reflecting IBM's strategic shift towards more efficient operations and cost management.

Conversely, Corning Incorporated has experienced a steady increase in its cost of revenue, rising from about $5.7 billion in 2014 to nearly $8.8 billion in 2024, marking a 54% increase. This growth aligns with Corning's expansion in the materials science sector, driven by innovation and increased production capacity. These contrasting trends highlight the diverse strategies and market dynamics influencing these industry giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025