Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Intuit Inc. or Analog Devices, Inc.

Intuit vs. Analog Devices: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Intuit Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144546760001762000000
Thursday, January 1, 20154789720001771000000
Friday, January 1, 20164614380001807000000
Sunday, January 1, 20176910460001973000000
Monday, January 1, 20186959370002298000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196480940002524000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206599230002727000000
Friday, January 1, 20219154180003626000000
Saturday, January 1, 202212661750004986000000
Sunday, January 1, 202312735840005062000000
Monday, January 1, 202410686400005730000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Intuit Inc. and Analog Devices, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2024, Intuit's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 225%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in customer acquisition. In contrast, Analog Devices maintained a more conservative growth of around 135%, indicating a focus on operational efficiency.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

By 2023, Intuit's SG&A expenses were nearly four times higher than Analog Devices, highlighting its expansive business model. However, Analog Devices' steady increase suggests a strategic balance between growth and cost management. This comparison offers valuable insights into how two industry leaders navigate financial strategies to optimize their operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025