International Business Machines Corporation or Intuit Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

IBM vs. Intuit: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationIntuit Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014224720000001762000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015198940000001771000000
Friday, January 1, 2016202790000001807000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017196800000001973000000
Monday, January 1, 2018193660000002298000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019187240000002524000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020205610000002727000000
Friday, January 1, 2021187450000003626000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022174830000004986000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023179970000005062000000
Monday, January 1, 2024295360000005730000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: IBM or Intuit?

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Intuit Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, IBM's SG&A expenses have fluctuated, peaking in 2024 with a 30% increase from the previous year. In contrast, Intuit has shown a steady upward trend, with a 225% rise over the same period. This suggests Intuit's strategic investments in growth and innovation, while IBM's volatility may reflect restructuring efforts. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, understanding these financial strategies offers valuable insights into corporate resilience and adaptability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025