__timestamp | International Business Machines Corporation | Texas Instruments Incorporated |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 22472000000 | 1843000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 19894000000 | 1748000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 20279000000 | 1767000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 19680000000 | 1694000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 19366000000 | 1684000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 18724000000 | 1645000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 20561000000 | 1623000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 18745000000 | 1666000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 17483000000 | 1704000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 17997000000 | 1825000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 29536000000 | 1794000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Texas Instruments Incorporated (TI) have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2024, IBM's SG&A expenses fluctuated significantly, peaking in 2024 with a 42% increase from its lowest point in 2023. In contrast, TI maintained a more stable trajectory, with expenses decreasing by approximately 3% over the same period.
IBM's higher SG&A costs, averaging around 12 times those of TI, reflect its expansive global operations and diverse product offerings. Meanwhile, TI's leaner cost structure highlights its focus on efficiency and specialization in semiconductor manufacturing. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, these insights into SG&A management offer valuable lessons in balancing growth and cost control.
Annual Revenue Comparison: International Business Machines Corporation vs Texas Instruments Incorporated
Cost Insights: Breaking Down International Business Machines Corporation and Texas Instruments Incorporated's Expenses
Gross Profit Comparison: International Business Machines Corporation and Texas Instruments Incorporated Trends
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of International Business Machines Corporation and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
International Business Machines Corporation or Intuit Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
R&D Spending Showdown: International Business Machines Corporation vs Texas Instruments Incorporated
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: International Business Machines Corporation vs QUALCOMM Incorporated
Comparing SG&A Expenses: International Business Machines Corporation vs Adobe Inc. Trends and Insights
International Business Machines Corporation vs Shopify Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
EBITDA Performance Review: International Business Machines Corporation vs Texas Instruments Incorporated
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing International Business Machines Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? International Business Machines Corporation or Sony Group Corporation