Comparing SG&A Expenses: International Business Machines Corporation vs Adobe Inc. Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: Adobe vs. IBM - A Decade of Financial Strategy

__timestampAdobe Inc.International Business Machines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014221514000022472000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015221516100019894000000
Friday, January 1, 2016248790700020279000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017282229800019680000000
Monday, January 1, 2018336572700019366000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019412498400018724000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020455900000020561000000
Friday, January 1, 2021540600000018745000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022618700000017483000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023676400000017997000000
Monday, January 1, 2024729300000029536000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, the financial strategies of industry leaders like Adobe Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) offer a fascinating glimpse into their operational priorities. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, Adobe's Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses have surged by approximately 230%, reflecting its aggressive growth and expansion strategies. In contrast, IBM's SG&A expenses have shown a more fluctuating pattern, peaking in 2024 with a 30% increase from its 2014 figures.

This divergence highlights Adobe's focus on scaling its operations, while IBM's strategy appears more conservative, possibly reflecting its established market position. The data underscores the dynamic nature of the tech industry, where financial decisions are pivotal in shaping a company's trajectory. As we look to the future, these trends may offer insights into the evolving priorities of these tech titans.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025