Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? International Business Machines Corporation or Sony Group Corporation

IBM vs. Sony: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationSony Group Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014224720000001728520000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015198940000001811461000000
Friday, January 1, 2016202790000001691930000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017196800000001505956000000
Monday, January 1, 2018193660000001583197000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019187240000001576825000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020205610000001502625000000
Friday, January 1, 2021187450000001469955000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022174830000001588473000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023179970000001969170000000
Monday, January 1, 2024295360000002156156000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of technology and electronics, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Sony Group Corporation have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2024, IBM's SG&A expenses fluctuated, peaking in 2024 with a 30% increase from its lowest point in 2023. Meanwhile, Sony's expenses remained significantly higher, reflecting its expansive global operations. Despite this, Sony managed to reduce its SG&A costs by approximately 15% from 2015 to 2020, before a sharp rise in 2023. This data highlights the strategic differences between a tech giant and a consumer electronics leader, offering insights into their operational efficiencies and market strategies. As businesses navigate the complexities of global markets, understanding these cost structures becomes essential for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025