| __timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | International Business Machines Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 22472000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 19894000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 20279000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 19680000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 19366000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 18724000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 20561000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 18745000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 17483000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 17997000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 29536000000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for evaluating corporate performance. This analysis juxtaposes two industry titans: International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT), from 2014 to 2024.
Over the past decade, IBM's SG&A expenses have shown a significant fluctuation, peaking in 2024 with a 48% increase from 2019. In contrast, AMAT has demonstrated a steady upward trend, with a 95% rise in SG&A expenses over the same period. This suggests a strategic expansion and investment in operational capabilities.
While IBM's higher SG&A expenses reflect its expansive global operations, AMAT's consistent growth indicates a focused approach to scaling its business. Investors and analysts should consider these trends when evaluating the companies' financial health and strategic direction.
Comparing Revenue Performance: International Business Machines Corporation or Applied Materials, Inc.?
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for International Business Machines Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc.
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing International Business Machines Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: International Business Machines Corporation vs Adobe Inc. Trends and Insights
R&D Spending Showdown: International Business Machines Corporation vs Applied Materials, Inc.
International Business Machines Corporation or Texas Instruments Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
International Business Machines Corporation vs Shopify Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? International Business Machines Corporation or Sony Group Corporation
EBITDA Performance Review: International Business Machines Corporation vs Applied Materials, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of International Business Machines Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: International Business Machines Corporation vs Arista Networks, Inc. Trends and Insights