Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Cisco Systems, Inc. vs NetApp, Inc.

Cisco vs. NetApp: A Decade of Cost Efficiency Trends

__timestampCisco Systems, Inc.NetApp, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014193730000002406000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015194800000002289500000
Friday, January 1, 2016182870000002173000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017177810000002129000000
Monday, January 1, 2018187240000002212000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019192380000002201000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020176180000001789000000
Friday, January 1, 2021179240000001929000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022193090000002098000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023212450000002153000000
Monday, January 1, 2024189750000001835000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving tech industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Cisco Systems, Inc. and NetApp, Inc., two stalwarts in the field, have shown distinct trends in their cost of revenue from 2014 to 2024. Cisco's cost of revenue has seen a slight decline, averaging around $18.9 billion annually, with a notable peak in 2023. This represents a 10% increase from its lowest point in 2020. Meanwhile, NetApp's cost of revenue has remained relatively stable, averaging $2.1 billion, with a 24% decrease from its peak in 2014 to its lowest in 2020. These trends highlight Cisco's ability to manage costs more dynamically, while NetApp maintains a steady approach. As the tech landscape continues to shift, these companies' strategies in cost management will be pivotal in maintaining their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025