Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? International Business Machines Corporation or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

IBM vs. Take-Two: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201422472000000402370000
Thursday, January 1, 201519894000000410434000
Friday, January 1, 201620279000000390761000
Sunday, January 1, 201719680000000496862000
Monday, January 1, 201819366000000503920000
Tuesday, January 1, 201918724000000672634000
Wednesday, January 1, 202020561000000776659000
Friday, January 1, 202118745000000835668000
Saturday, January 1, 2022174830000001027284000
Sunday, January 1, 2023179970000002435700000
Monday, January 1, 2024295360000002266300000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain.

From 2014 to 2024, IBM's SG&A expenses fluctuated, peaking in 2024 with a 42% increase from its lowest point in 2023. In contrast, Take-Two Interactive's expenses grew steadily, with a notable 500% surge from 2014 to 2023. This divergence highlights IBM's volatile cost management against Take-Two's consistent growth strategy.

While IBM's expenses are significantly higher, reflecting its vast operational scale, Take-Two's rising costs indicate aggressive expansion in the gaming industry. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into how these companies navigate financial challenges and opportunities in their respective sectors.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025