__timestamp | Snap-on Incorporated | Waste Management, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1047900000 | 1481000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1009100000 | 1343000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1001400000 | 1410000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1101300000 | 1468000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1080700000 | 1453000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1071500000 | 1631000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1054800000 | 1728000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1202300000 | 1864000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1181200000 | 1938000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1249000000 | 1926000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 0 | 2264000000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate America, operational efficiency remains a cornerstone of success. Over the past decade, Waste Management, Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated have showcased distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Waste Management's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 30%, peaking in 2022. This reflects their strategic investments in sustainability and technology. Meanwhile, Snap-on's SG&A expenses grew by about 19%, with a notable increase in 2023, indicating a focus on innovation and market expansion. Despite these increases, both companies have maintained a steady growth trajectory, underscoring their resilience and adaptability in a competitive market. This analysis not only highlights the financial strategies of these industry giants but also offers insights into broader economic trends affecting operational costs.
Waste Management, Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Waste Management, Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Waste Management, Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Waste Management, Inc. vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Waste Management, Inc. vs Masco Corporation
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Waste Management, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Waste Management, Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Waste Management, Inc. and Pentair plc
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Waste Management, Inc. and RB Global, Inc.
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Waste Management, Inc. vs Snap-on Incorporated