__timestamp | Carlisle Companies Incorporated | Waste Management, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 379000000 | 1481000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 461900000 | 1343000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 532000000 | 1410000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 589400000 | 1468000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 625400000 | 1453000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 667100000 | 1631000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 603200000 | 1728000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 698200000 | 1864000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 811500000 | 1938000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 625200000 | 1926000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 722800000 | 2264000000 |
Unleashing insights
In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a crucial indicator of a company's operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Waste Management, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated have showcased contrasting trends in their SG&A expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Waste Management's SG&A expenses have consistently been higher, peaking at nearly $1.93 billion in 2022, reflecting a 30% increase from 2014. In contrast, Carlisle Companies saw a more modest rise, with expenses reaching $811 million in 2022, marking a 114% increase from 2014. This divergence highlights Waste Management's expansive operational scale compared to Carlisle's more conservative growth. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, understanding these financial dynamics offers valuable insights into strategic management and cost control.
Waste Management, Inc. vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Waste Management, Inc. and EMCOR Group, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Waste Management, Inc. vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs TransUnion
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Waste Management, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Waste Management, Inc. and AerCap Holdings N.V.
Waste Management, Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Waste Management, Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated
Waste Management, Inc. vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Waste Management, Inc. vs Masco Corporation