Waste Management, Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Waste Management vs. Stanley Black & Decker

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.Waste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201425959000001481000000
Thursday, January 1, 201524864000001343000000
Friday, January 1, 201626239000001410000000
Sunday, January 1, 201729801000001468000000
Monday, January 1, 201831717000001453000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201930410000001631000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030896000001728000000
Friday, January 1, 202132404000001864000000
Saturday, January 1, 202233700000001938000000
Sunday, January 1, 202328293000001926000000
Monday, January 1, 202433105000002264000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Waste Management or Stanley Black & Decker?

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, Waste Management, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have shown distinct approaches to handling these costs.

Stanley Black & Decker's SG&A expenses have fluctuated, peaking in 2022 with a 30% increase from 2014, before dropping by 16% in 2023. In contrast, Waste Management has demonstrated a more consistent growth, with a 30% rise over the same period, reflecting a steady approach to cost management.

This data highlights the strategic differences between the two companies. While Stanley Black & Decker's expenses are more volatile, Waste Management's steady increase suggests a more controlled cost management strategy. Understanding these trends can provide valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025