EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Automatic Data Processing, Inc. vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

ADP vs. Jacobs: A Decade of EBITDA Growth

__timestampAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142616900000699015000
Thursday, January 1, 20152355100000598932000
Friday, January 1, 20162579500000431954000
Sunday, January 1, 20172927200000527765000
Monday, January 1, 20182762900000606328000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193544500000604075000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203769700000685042000
Friday, January 1, 202139316000001019116000
Saturday, January 1, 202244055000001277649000
Sunday, January 1, 202352446000001392039000
Monday, January 1, 202458000000001255083000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Decade of EBITDA Growth: ADP vs. Jacobs Engineering

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, EBITDA serves as a crucial metric for evaluating a company's operational performance. Over the past decade, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. have demonstrated contrasting trajectories in their EBITDA growth.

From 2014 to 2024, ADP's EBITDA has surged by approximately 122%, reflecting its robust business model and strategic initiatives. In contrast, Jacobs Engineering has experienced a more modest growth of around 80% during the same period. Notably, ADP's EBITDA in 2023 reached a peak, nearly quadrupling its 2014 figure, while Jacobs Engineering saw a steady climb, peaking in 2023 before a slight dip in 2024.

This comparison highlights ADP's consistent upward trend, underscoring its resilience and adaptability in a competitive market. Meanwhile, Jacobs Engineering's steady growth trajectory suggests a stable yet less aggressive expansion strategy.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025