A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

ADP's EBITDA soars while Stanley Black & Decker faces challenges.

__timestampAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201426169000001975400000
Thursday, January 1, 201523551000001741900000
Friday, January 1, 201625795000001810200000
Sunday, January 1, 201729272000002196000000
Monday, January 1, 201827629000001791200000
Tuesday, January 1, 201935445000001920600000
Wednesday, January 1, 202037697000002004200000
Friday, January 1, 202139316000002345500000
Saturday, January 1, 20224405500000942800000
Sunday, January 1, 20235244600000802700000
Monday, January 1, 20245800000000286300000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Comparative Analysis of EBITDA Growth: ADP vs. Stanley Black & Decker

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, EBITDA serves as a crucial metric for evaluating a company's operational performance. Over the past decade, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) has demonstrated a robust growth trajectory, with its EBITDA increasing by approximately 122% from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has faced a more turbulent journey, with its EBITDA peaking in 2021 before experiencing a significant decline of over 65% by 2023. This divergence highlights ADP's resilience and strategic prowess in navigating market challenges, while Stanley Black & Decker grapples with industry-specific hurdles. As we look to the future, the absence of data for Stanley Black & Decker in 2024 raises questions about its financial outlook, whereas ADP continues to project strength with an anticipated EBITDA of $5.8 billion.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025