Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? United Rentals, Inc. or Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

SG&A Cost Strategies: United Rentals vs. Jacobs Engineering

__timestampJacobs Engineering Group Inc.United Rentals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141545716000758000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151522811000714000000
Friday, January 1, 20161429233000719000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171379983000903000000
Monday, January 1, 201821803990001038000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201920721770001092000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202050695000979000000
Friday, January 1, 202123556830001199000000
Saturday, January 1, 202224091900001400000000
Sunday, January 1, 202323980780001527000000
Monday, January 1, 202421403200001645000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of industrial services, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, United Rentals, Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. have showcased distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2024, Jacobs Engineering consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $2.4 billion in 2022. In contrast, United Rentals demonstrated a more conservative approach, with expenses rising from $758 million in 2014 to $1.65 billion in 2024, marking a 117% increase.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Jacobs Engineering's SG&A expenses grew by 39% over the same period, reflecting their expansive operational strategy. This comparison highlights the differing financial strategies of these industry leaders. As businesses navigate economic challenges, understanding these trends offers valuable insights into cost management and strategic planning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025