Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? International Business Machines Corporation or Fortive Corporation

SG&A Cost Efficiency: IBM vs. Fortive Over a Decade

__timestampFortive CorporationInternational Business Machines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014141630000022472000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015134790000019894000000
Friday, January 1, 2016140200000020279000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017153760000019680000000
Monday, January 1, 2018172860000019366000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019221950000018724000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020174840000020561000000
Friday, January 1, 2021183950000018745000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022195660000017483000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023206260000017997000000
Monday, January 1, 2024217350000029536000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis pits two industry titans, Fortive Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), against each other in a battle of cost efficiency from 2014 to 2023.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Over the past decade, IBM's SG&A expenses have consistently dwarfed those of Fortive, averaging around 20 times higher. However, Fortive has shown a steady increase in its SG&A expenses, peaking in 2019 with a 55% rise from 2014. Meanwhile, IBM's expenses have fluctuated, with a notable dip in 2023, marking a 20% decrease from its 2014 figures.

The Missing Year

Interestingly, Fortive's data for 2024 is missing, leaving a gap in the analysis. This absence highlights the importance of complete data for accurate financial insights.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025