__timestamp | International Business Machines Corporation | Keysight Technologies, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 22472000000 | 790000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 19894000000 | 793000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 20279000000 | 818000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 19680000000 | 1049000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 19366000000 | 1205000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 18724000000 | 1155000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 20561000000 | 1097000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 18745000000 | 1195000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 17483000000 | 1283000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 17997000000 | 1307000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 29536000000 | 1395000000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, cost management remains a pivotal focus for industry leaders. International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Keysight Technologies, Inc. have showcased distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, IBM's SG&A expenses have fluctuated, peaking in 2024 with a 30% increase from its lowest point in 2023. Meanwhile, Keysight Technologies has demonstrated a steady upward trend, with a 76% rise in SG&A expenses from 2014 to 2024. This divergence highlights IBM's strategic cost adjustments and Keysight's consistent growth strategy. As these companies navigate the complexities of the global market, their cost management strategies offer valuable insights into their operational priorities and financial health.
International Business Machines Corporation or Keysight Technologies, Inc.: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Cost of Revenue Trends: International Business Machines Corporation vs Keysight Technologies, Inc.
International Business Machines Corporation and Keysight Technologies, Inc.: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: International Business Machines Corporation vs Keysight Technologies, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of International Business Machines Corporation and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing International Business Machines Corporation and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for International Business Machines Corporation and GoDaddy Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: International Business Machines Corporation vs Splunk Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: International Business Machines Corporation vs Corpay, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: International Business Machines Corporation vs Tyler Technologies, Inc. Trends and Insights
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? International Business Machines Corporation or Fortive Corporation
International Business Machines Corporation vs CDW Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends