Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Axon Enterprise, Inc. or J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Axon vs. J.B. Hunt

__timestampAxon Enterprise, Inc.J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201454158000152469000
Thursday, January 1, 201569698000166799000
Friday, January 1, 2016108076000185436000
Sunday, January 1, 2017138692000273440000
Monday, January 1, 2018156886000323587000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019212959000383981000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020307286000348076000
Friday, January 1, 2021515007000395533000
Saturday, January 1, 2022401575000570191000
Sunday, January 1, 2023496874000590242000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Axon Enterprise, Inc. and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. have been navigating this financial terrain since 2014. Over the past decade, Axon has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 817%, while J.B. Hunt's expenses increased by about 287%. Despite this, J.B. Hunt consistently maintained higher SG&A costs, peaking at nearly $590 million in 2023, compared to Axon's $497 million. This trend suggests that while Axon is rapidly expanding its operational costs, J.B. Hunt's larger scale requires more substantial administrative spending. The data highlights the strategic differences in cost management between a tech-driven enterprise and a logistics giant, offering insights into their operational efficiencies and growth strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025