Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Waste Management, Inc. vs Owens Corning

SG&A Expenses: Waste Management vs Owens Corning

__timestampOwens CorningWaste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144870000001481000000
Thursday, January 1, 20155250000001343000000
Friday, January 1, 20165840000001410000000
Sunday, January 1, 20176200000001468000000
Monday, January 1, 20187000000001453000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196980000001631000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206640000001728000000
Friday, January 1, 20217570000001864000000
Saturday, January 1, 20228030000001938000000
Sunday, January 1, 20238310000001926000000
Monday, January 1, 20242264000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs Owens Corning

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Waste Management, Inc. and Owens Corning have showcased distinct trajectories in their SG&A expenditures. From 2014 to 2023, Waste Management, Inc. consistently outpaced Owens Corning, with expenses peaking at nearly 1.93 billion in 2022, marking a 30% increase from 2014. In contrast, Owens Corning's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 70% over the same period, reaching 831 million in 2023. This divergence highlights Waste Management's robust operational scale, while Owens Corning's growth reflects strategic investments in administrative capabilities. As businesses navigate the complexities of cost management, these insights offer a window into the strategic priorities of two industry giants, underscoring the importance of efficient resource allocation in driving long-term success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025