International Business Machines Corporation vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

IBM vs. ASE: A Decade of Cost Efficiency Compared

__timestampASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.International Business Machines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201420305100000046386000000
Thursday, January 1, 201523315300000041057000000
Friday, January 1, 201622169000000041403000000
Sunday, January 1, 201723770900000042196000000
Monday, January 1, 201830992900000042655000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201934887100000026181000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202039899400000024314000000
Friday, January 1, 202145962800000025865000000
Saturday, January 1, 202253594300000027842000000
Sunday, January 1, 202349015733900027560000000
Monday, January 1, 202449972288000027202000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Exploring Cost Efficiency: IBM vs. ASE Technology

In the ever-evolving landscape of global technology, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, ASE Technology's cost of revenue surged by approximately 141%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and scaling strategies. In contrast, IBM's cost of revenue decreased by about 41%, showcasing its strategic shift towards more efficient operations and services.

The data reveals a stark contrast in financial strategies: while ASE Technology's costs peaked in 2022, IBM consistently reduced its expenses, reaching its lowest in 2023. This divergence highlights the different paths these tech giants are taking in the competitive market. Missing data for ASE Technology in 2024 suggests a potential shift or reevaluation in their financial reporting. Stay tuned as these industry leaders continue to redefine efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025