International Business Machines Corporation or Synopsys, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

IBM vs. Synopsys: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationSynopsys, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201422472000000608294000
Thursday, January 1, 201519894000000639504000
Friday, January 1, 201620279000000668330000
Sunday, January 1, 201719680000000746092000
Monday, January 1, 201819366000000885538000
Tuesday, January 1, 201918724000000862108000
Wednesday, January 1, 202020561000000916540000
Friday, January 1, 2021187450000001035479000
Saturday, January 1, 2022174830000001133617000
Sunday, January 1, 2023179970000001299327000
Monday, January 1, 2024295360000001427838000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: IBM or Synopsys?

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology giants, managing operational costs is crucial for sustained growth and profitability. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry leaders: International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Synopsys, Inc., from 2014 to 2024.

IBM, a stalwart in the tech industry, has consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, averaging around $20 billion annually. However, a notable spike occurred in 2024, with expenses reaching nearly $30 billion, a 50% increase from the previous year. In contrast, Synopsys, a leader in electronic design automation, has maintained a more modest SG&A expense profile, averaging under $1 billion annually. Despite a steady increase, Synopsys' expenses in 2024 were only about 5% of IBM's.

This comparison highlights IBM's expansive operational scale, while Synopsys showcases efficient cost management, crucial for its niche market leadership.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025