Cost of Revenue Comparison: Analog Devices, Inc. vs MicroStrategy Incorporated

Analog Devices vs. MicroStrategy: Revenue Cost Trends Unveiled

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.MicroStrategy Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20141034585000135210000
Thursday, January 1, 20151175830000101108000
Friday, January 1, 2016119423600093147000
Sunday, January 1, 2017204590700096649000
Monday, January 1, 2018196764000099499000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019197731500099974000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020191257800091055000
Friday, January 1, 2021279327400091909000
Saturday, January 1, 20224481479000102989000
Sunday, January 1, 20234428321000109944000
Monday, January 1, 20244045814000129468000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for investors and analysts alike. Analog Devices, Inc. and MicroStrategy Incorporated, two giants in their respective fields, offer a fascinating comparison. From 2014 to 2023, Analog Devices saw a staggering 330% increase in its cost of revenue, peaking in 2022. This reflects its aggressive expansion and investment in cutting-edge technologies. In contrast, MicroStrategy's cost of revenue remained relatively stable, with a modest 20% increase over the same period. This stability suggests a focus on optimizing existing operations rather than expansion. Notably, data for 2024 is missing for MicroStrategy, indicating potential reporting delays or strategic shifts. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025