Analog Devices, Inc. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency Showdown: Analog Devices vs Cadence Design

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141034585000223706000
Thursday, January 1, 20151175830000238453000
Friday, January 1, 20161194236000256492000
Sunday, January 1, 20172045907000237390000
Monday, January 1, 20181967640000258747000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191977315000266357000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201912578000305498000
Friday, January 1, 20212793274000307006000
Saturday, January 1, 20224481479000371623000
Sunday, January 1, 20234428321000435041000
Monday, January 1, 20244045814000210902000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Exploring Cost Efficiency: Analog Devices, Inc. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding cost efficiency is crucial for investors and industry analysts. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for two giants: Analog Devices, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Analog Devices, Inc. has shown a significant increase in its cost of revenue, peaking in 2022 with a staggering 333% rise from 2014. This growth reflects the company's expanding operations and market reach. In contrast, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has maintained a more stable trajectory, with a 94% increase over the same period, indicating a more controlled cost management strategy.

Interestingly, 2023 data reveals a slight dip for Analog Devices, Inc., while Cadence Design Systems, Inc. continues its upward trend. This divergence highlights differing strategic approaches in managing operational costs, offering valuable insights for stakeholders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025