Cost of Revenue Comparison: Analog Devices, Inc. vs Amphenol Corporation

Amphenol vs. Analog Devices: Cost Trends Unveiled

__timestampAmphenol CorporationAnalog Devices, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201436517000001034585000
Thursday, January 1, 201537892000001175830000
Friday, January 1, 201642464000001194236000
Sunday, January 1, 201747014000002045907000
Monday, January 1, 201855471000001967640000
Tuesday, January 1, 201956094000001977315000
Wednesday, January 1, 202059348000001912578000
Friday, January 1, 202174745000002793274000
Saturday, January 1, 202285948000004481479000
Sunday, January 1, 202384706000004428321000
Monday, January 1, 2024100830000004045814000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of the electronics industry, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Over the past decade, Amphenol Corporation and Analog Devices, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2024, Amphenol's cost of revenue surged by approximately 176%, peaking at over $10 billion in 2024. This reflects their aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies. In contrast, Analog Devices, Inc. experienced a more moderate increase of around 291%, reaching over $4 billion in 2024. This growth trajectory highlights their focus on innovation and efficiency. Notably, 2022 marked a significant year for both companies, with Amphenol's costs rising by 14% from the previous year, while Analog Devices saw a remarkable 60% jump. These figures underscore the evolving strategies and market conditions influencing these industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025