Comparing SG&A Expenses: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: Strategic Insights from Industry Leaders

__timestampJacobs Engineering Group Inc.Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141545716000324539000
Thursday, January 1, 20151522811000319173000
Friday, January 1, 20161429233000327505000
Sunday, January 1, 20171379983000482852000
Monday, January 1, 20182180399000573644000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192072177000936600000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202050695000877100000
Friday, January 1, 202123556830001005000000
Saturday, January 1, 202224091900001020000000
Sunday, January 1, 202323980780001139000000
Monday, January 1, 202421403200001248000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of industrial services, understanding the financial strategies of leading companies is crucial. Over the past decade, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation have showcased distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.

From 2014 to 2023, Jacobs Engineering consistently allocated a significant portion of its budget to SG&A, peaking in 2022 with a 74% increase from its 2014 figures. This strategic investment underscores their commitment to robust administrative and sales operations. In contrast, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies demonstrated a more conservative approach, with a notable 250% rise in SG&A expenses from 2014 to 2023, reflecting their strategic expansion and operational scaling.

Interestingly, data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. As these industry leaders continue to evolve, their financial strategies offer valuable insights into their operational priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025