SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

SG&A Efficiency: Booz Allen vs. Westinghouse

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20142229642000324539000
Thursday, January 1, 20152159439000319173000
Friday, January 1, 20162319592000327505000
Sunday, January 1, 20172568511000482852000
Monday, January 1, 20182719909000573644000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192932602000936600000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203334378000877100000
Friday, January 1, 202133627220001005000000
Saturday, January 1, 202236331500001020000000
Sunday, January 1, 202343417690001139000000
Monday, January 1, 202412814430001248000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Corporations

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis compares the SG&A efficiency of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation from 2014 to 2023.

Booz Allen Hamilton, a leader in management consulting, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 95% over the decade, peaking in 2023. This reflects its strategic investments in expanding its consulting services. In contrast, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, a key player in the transportation sector, experienced a more modest increase of around 250% in SG&A expenses, indicating a steady but controlled growth strategy.

Interestingly, 2024 data for Westinghouse is missing, suggesting potential reporting delays or strategic shifts. This comparison highlights the diverse approaches to SG&A management in different industries, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025