Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: International Business Machines Corporation vs Microchip Technology Incorporated

IBM vs. Microchip: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationMicrochip Technology Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 201446386000000802474000
Thursday, January 1, 201541057000000917472000
Friday, January 1, 201641403000000967870000
Sunday, January 1, 2017421960000001650611000
Monday, January 1, 2018426550000001560100000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019261810000002418200000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020243140000002032100000
Friday, January 1, 2021258650000002059600000
Saturday, January 1, 2022278420000002371300000
Sunday, January 1, 2023275600000002740800000
Monday, January 1, 2024272020000002638700000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Decade of Cost Efficiency: IBM vs. Microchip Technology

In the ever-evolving tech industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Microchip Technology Incorporated have showcased contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. IBM, a stalwart in the tech world, has seen a significant reduction in its cost of revenue, dropping from approximately $46 billion in 2014 to around $27 billion in 2024. This represents a 41% decrease, highlighting IBM's strategic shift towards more efficient operations.

Conversely, Microchip Technology, a leader in semiconductor solutions, has experienced a steady increase in its cost of revenue, rising from $802 million in 2014 to nearly $2.6 billion in 2024. This 225% increase reflects the company's expansion and growing market presence. As these two giants navigate the complexities of the tech landscape, their financial strategies offer valuable insights into the industry's future.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025