Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: International Business Machines Corporation vs Electronic Arts Inc.

IBM vs. EA: A Decade of Cost Efficiency Trends

__timestampElectronic Arts Inc.International Business Machines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014134700000046386000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015142900000041057000000
Friday, January 1, 2016135400000041403000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017129800000042196000000
Monday, January 1, 2018127700000042655000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019132200000026181000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020136900000024314000000
Friday, January 1, 2021149400000025865000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022185900000027842000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023179200000027560000000
Monday, January 1, 2024171000000027202000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Tale of Two Giants: IBM vs. EA in Cost Efficiency

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and entertainment, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. This chart offers a fascinating glimpse into the cost of revenue trends for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) from 2014 to 2024. Over this decade, IBM's cost of revenue has seen a significant decline, dropping by approximately 41% from its peak in 2014. In contrast, EA's cost of revenue has shown a more stable trajectory, with a modest increase of around 27% over the same period.

This divergence highlights the distinct operational strategies of these two industry leaders. While IBM has been streamlining its operations, EA has been investing in its gaming portfolio. As we look to the future, understanding these trends can provide valuable insights into the strategic directions of these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025