__timestamp | Cintas Corporation | Waste Management, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1302752000 | 1481000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1224930000 | 1343000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1348122000 | 1410000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1527380000 | 1468000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1916792000 | 1453000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1980644000 | 1631000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 2071052000 | 1728000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1929159000 | 1864000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 2044876000 | 1938000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 2370704000 | 1926000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 2617783000 | 2264000000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a critical measure of a company's operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Cintas Corporation and Waste Management, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their SG&A expenses.
From 2014 to 2023, Cintas Corporation's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 82%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and strategic investments. Notably, the company saw a significant jump in 2023, with expenses reaching a peak, indicating robust growth and possibly increased market share.
Conversely, Waste Management, Inc. has maintained a more stable SG&A expense profile, with a modest increase of around 30% over the same period. This stability suggests a focus on operational efficiency and cost control. However, data for 2024 is missing, leaving room for speculation on future trends.
Waste Management, Inc. vs Cintas Corporation: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Cost of Revenue Trends: Waste Management, Inc. vs Cintas Corporation
Gross Profit Comparison: Waste Management, Inc. and Cintas Corporation Trends
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs Trane Technologies plc Trends and Insights
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Waste Management, Inc. vs 3M Company
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Waste Management, Inc. and Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Waste Management, Inc. and Illinois Tool Works Inc.
Waste Management, Inc. and TransDigm Group Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Waste Management, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Waste Management, Inc. vs Northrop Grumman Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends