Waste Management, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Divergent SG&A trends of industry giants over a decade.

__timestampThomson Reuters CorporationWaste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201492090000001481000000
Thursday, January 1, 201588100000001343000000
Friday, January 1, 201682320000001410000000
Sunday, January 1, 201780790000001468000000
Monday, January 1, 201841310000001453000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201944130000001631000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202039990000001728000000
Friday, January 1, 202116240000001864000000
Saturday, January 1, 202216220000001938000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023640000001926000000
Monday, January 1, 20242264000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Giants

In the world of corporate finance, understanding the spending patterns of industry leaders can offer valuable insights. Waste Management, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation, two titans in their respective fields, have shown contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade.

From 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters experienced a dramatic 99% decrease in SG&A expenses, plummeting from a peak in 2014 to a mere fraction by 2023. This sharp decline could indicate strategic cost-cutting measures or a shift in business focus. In contrast, Waste Management's SG&A expenses have steadily increased by approximately 30% over the same period, reflecting potential growth and expansion strategies.

These divergent paths highlight the unique challenges and opportunities faced by companies in different sectors. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, their financial strategies offer a window into their evolving priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025