Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Global Payments Inc. vs Masco Corporation

SG&A Expenses: Growth vs Stability in Corporate Strategy

__timestampGlobal Payments Inc.Masco Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201412950140001607000000
Thursday, January 1, 201513255670001339000000
Friday, January 1, 201614110960001403000000
Sunday, January 1, 201714882580001442000000
Monday, January 1, 201815342970001478000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201920466720001274000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202028788780001292000000
Friday, January 1, 202133911610001413000000
Saturday, January 1, 202235245780001390000000
Sunday, January 1, 202340737680001481000000
Monday, January 1, 202442853070001468000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Global Payments Inc. vs Masco Corporation

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Global Payments Inc. has seen a remarkable 214% increase in SG&A expenses, rising from approximately $1.3 billion in 2014 to over $4 billion in 2023. This growth reflects the company's aggressive expansion and strategic investments.

Conversely, Masco Corporation's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, fluctuating modestly around the $1.4 billion mark. This stability suggests a consistent operational strategy, focusing on efficiency and cost management.

The contrasting trends between these two industry giants highlight different strategic approaches: Global Payments Inc.'s dynamic growth strategy versus Masco Corporation's steady operational focus. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, these insights into SG&A expenses offer valuable lessons in balancing growth and stability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025