Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Global Payments Inc. or Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

SG&A Cost Optimization: Booz Allen vs. Global Payments

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationGlobal Payments Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201422296420001295014000
Thursday, January 1, 201521594390001325567000
Friday, January 1, 201623195920001411096000
Sunday, January 1, 201725685110001488258000
Monday, January 1, 201827199090001534297000
Tuesday, January 1, 201929326020002046672000
Wednesday, January 1, 202033343780002878878000
Friday, January 1, 202133627220003391161000
Saturday, January 1, 202236331500003524578000
Sunday, January 1, 202343417690004073768000
Monday, January 1, 202412814430004285307000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis delves into the SG&A cost optimization strategies of two industry giants: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Global Payments Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Booz Allen Hamilton has shown a consistent increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $4.34 billion in 2023. This represents a 95% increase from 2014, indicating a strategic expansion or investment in administrative capabilities.

Global Payments Inc.

Global Payments Inc. also experienced a significant rise, with SG&A expenses reaching around $4.07 billion in 2023, marking a 214% increase since 2014. This suggests aggressive growth and scaling efforts.

While both companies have seen substantial increases, the data suggests that Global Payments Inc. has been more aggressive in scaling its operations, as evidenced by the higher percentage increase in SG&A costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025