Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rentokil Initial plc

Cost of Revenue: Parker-Hannifin vs. Rentokil Initial

__timestampParker-Hannifin CorporationRentokil Initial plc
Wednesday, January 1, 201410188227000297500000
Thursday, January 1, 20159655245000310200000
Friday, January 1, 20168823384000376100000
Sunday, January 1, 20179188962000474900000
Monday, January 1, 201810762841000514200000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019107034840002099000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020102865180002136400000
Friday, January 1, 2021104496800002239100000
Saturday, January 1, 2022113872670002737000000
Sunday, January 1, 202312635892000927000000
Monday, January 1, 202412801816000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. Parker-Hannifin Corporation, a leader in motion and control technologies, and Rentokil Initial plc, a global pest control and hygiene services provider, offer a fascinating study in contrasts.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation: A Steady Climb

From 2014 to 2023, Parker-Hannifin's cost of revenue has shown a consistent upward trend, peaking at approximately $12.6 billion in 2023. This represents a 24% increase over the decade, reflecting the company's robust growth and expansion strategies.

Rentokil Initial plc: A Volatile Journey

Rentokil Initial, on the other hand, experienced a more volatile trajectory. While their cost of revenue surged by over 800% from 2014 to 2022, reaching nearly $2.7 billion, 2023 saw a significant drop to $927 million, highlighting potential challenges or strategic shifts.

This analysis underscores the diverse strategies and market conditions faced by these industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025