Analyzing Cost of Revenue: International Business Machines Corporation and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

IBM vs. Broadridge: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.International Business Machines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014176140000046386000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015182820000041057000000
Friday, January 1, 2016197590000041403000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017310960000042196000000
Monday, January 1, 2018316960000042655000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019313190000026181000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020326510000024314000000
Friday, January 1, 2021357080000025865000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022411690000027842000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023427550000027560000000
Monday, January 1, 2024457290000027202000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: IBM vs. Broadridge Financial Solutions

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and financial services, understanding the cost dynamics of industry giants like International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. is crucial. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, IBM's cost of revenue has seen a significant decline of approximately 41%, dropping from 46.4 billion to 27.2 billion. This trend reflects IBM's strategic shift towards more efficient operations and possibly a focus on higher-margin services.

Conversely, Broadridge Financial Solutions has experienced a robust growth in its cost of revenue, increasing by nearly 160% from 1.8 billion to 4.6 billion. This surge indicates Broadridge's expansion and scaling efforts in the financial technology sector. The contrasting trajectories of these two companies highlight the diverse strategies employed in managing operational costs and adapting to market demands.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025