Analog Devices, Inc. or Lam Research Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Analog Devices vs. Lam Research

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014454676000613341000
Thursday, January 1, 2015478972000591611000
Friday, January 1, 2016461438000630954000
Sunday, January 1, 2017691046000667485000
Monday, January 1, 2018695937000762219000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019648094000702407000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020659923000682479000
Friday, January 1, 2021915418000829875000
Saturday, January 1, 20221266175000885737000
Sunday, January 1, 20231273584000832753000
Monday, January 1, 20241068640000868247000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Analog Devices or Lam Research?

In the competitive landscape of semiconductor companies, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Analog Devices, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation have shown distinct trends in their SG&A management. From 2014 to 2024, Analog Devices saw a significant increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2023 with a 180% rise from 2014. In contrast, Lam Research maintained a more stable trajectory, with a 44% increase over the same period. Notably, in 2022, Analog Devices' SG&A expenses were 43% higher than Lam Research's, highlighting their differing strategies. As the semiconductor industry continues to evolve, these companies' ability to manage operational costs will be pivotal in determining their market leadership. This analysis provides a window into their financial strategies, offering insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025