Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Analog Devices, Inc. or KLA Corporation

SG&A Cost Management: Analog Devices vs. KLA Corporation

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.KLA Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014454676000384907000
Thursday, January 1, 2015478972000406864000
Friday, January 1, 2016461438000379399000
Sunday, January 1, 2017691046000389336000
Monday, January 1, 2018695937000443426000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019648094000599124000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020659923000734149000
Friday, January 1, 2021915418000729602000
Saturday, January 1, 20221266175000860007000
Sunday, January 1, 20231273584000986326000
Monday, January 1, 20241068640000969509000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of semiconductor companies, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Analog Devices, Inc. and KLA Corporation have demonstrated distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Analog Devices saw a 180% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2023. Meanwhile, KLA Corporation's expenses rose by 156% during the same period, with a notable surge in 2023.

Analog Devices consistently maintained higher SG&A costs, reflecting its expansive operational strategy. In contrast, KLA Corporation's more conservative approach allowed it to keep expenses relatively lower, despite a significant uptick in recent years. As both companies navigate the evolving market, their ability to manage these costs will be pivotal in sustaining competitive advantage. This analysis provides a window into their financial strategies, offering insights into their operational efficiencies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025