Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Analog Devices, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation

Semiconductor Giants: Cost Efficiency Showdown

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201410345850002599828000
Thursday, January 1, 201511758300002974976000
Friday, January 1, 201611942360003266971000
Sunday, January 1, 201720459070004410261000
Monday, January 1, 201819676400005911966000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919773150005295100000
Wednesday, January 1, 202019125780005436043000
Friday, January 1, 202127932740007820844000
Saturday, January 1, 202244814790009355232000
Sunday, January 1, 202344283210009651591000
Monday, January 1, 202440458140007852595000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Tale of Two Giants: Cost of Revenue Efficiency in the Semiconductor Industry

In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. This analysis compares the cost of revenue efficiency between two industry titans: Analog Devices, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation, from 2014 to 2024. Over this decade, Lam Research consistently outperformed Analog Devices in terms of cost efficiency, with an average cost of revenue nearly 2.4 times higher than its competitor. Notably, in 2023, Lam Research's cost of revenue peaked at approximately 9.65 billion, marking a 270% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, Analog Devices saw a 328% rise, reaching around 4.43 billion in the same year. This trend highlights Lam Research's robust growth trajectory, despite Analog Devices' significant improvements. As the semiconductor landscape continues to shift, these insights offer a glimpse into the strategic maneuvers of these industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025