Analog Devices, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison

Semiconductor Giants' EBITDA Battle: 2014-2023 Insights

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014943421000977923000
Thursday, January 1, 201510593840001155224000
Friday, January 1, 201612554680001365284000
Sunday, January 1, 201716654640002218837000
Monday, January 1, 201827066420003539694000
Tuesday, January 1, 201925274910002774013000
Wednesday, January 1, 202023177010002942327000
Friday, January 1, 202126007230004789174000
Saturday, January 1, 202256115790005715561000
Sunday, January 1, 202361508270005637608000
Monday, January 1, 202420327980004905157000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Tale of Two Giants: Analog Devices, Inc. vs. Lam Research Corporation

In the ever-evolving landscape of the semiconductor industry, two titans, Analog Devices, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation, have showcased remarkable EBITDA performance over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, both companies have demonstrated significant growth, with Lam Research Corporation leading the charge with an average EBITDA of approximately $3.3 billion, a 25% higher average than Analog Devices, Inc.

Key Insights

  • 2014-2018 Surge: Both companies experienced a robust growth phase, with Lam Research's EBITDA peaking at $3.5 billion in 2018, a 260% increase from 2014.
  • 2022 Peak: Analog Devices reached its zenith in 2023 with an EBITDA of $6.2 billion, surpassing Lam Research's $5.7 billion in 2022.
  • 2024 Decline: A notable dip in 2024 for Analog Devices, with EBITDA dropping to $2 billion, suggests potential market challenges.

This comparison highlights the dynamic nature of the semiconductor sector, where strategic decisions and market conditions can significantly impact financial performance.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025