__timestamp | L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 883000000 | 1633992000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1105000000 | 1544746000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1150000000 | 1359360000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1182000000 | 1453935000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1242000000 | 1657152000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2156000000 | 1543939000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3315000000 | 1656553000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3280000000 | 1527302000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 2998000000 | 1627116000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1921000000 | 3354103000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 3568000000 | 3315177000 |
Cracking the code
In the competitive landscape of industrial and defense sectors, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Parker-Hannifin Corporation and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. have been at the forefront of this financial balancing act since 2014.
From 2014 to 2023, Parker-Hannifin consistently maintained SG&A expenses around $1.6 billion, with a notable spike in 2023, reaching over $3.3 billion. This represents a 100% increase, indicating strategic investments or operational expansions. In contrast, L3Harris Technologies saw a dramatic rise in SG&A costs, peaking at $3.3 billion in 2020, before reducing to $1.9 billion by 2023, a 42% decrease, showcasing effective cost optimization strategies.
While Parker-Hannifin's expenses surged in 2023, L3Harris demonstrated a more controlled approach, reducing costs significantly over the years. This analysis highlights the dynamic strategies employed by these industry leaders in managing operational expenses.
Comparing Revenue Performance: Parker-Hannifin Corporation or L3Harris Technologies, Inc.?
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Parker-Hannifin Corporation vs L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Fastenal Company
Parker-Hannifin Corporation vs L3Harris Technologies, Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Parker-Hannifin Corporation vs Quanta Services, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Parker-Hannifin Corporation vs AMETEK, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Parker-Hannifin Corporation vs United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Parker-Hannifin Corporation vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. Trends and Insights
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Ferguson plc
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation