Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Equifax Inc. or ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.

Equifax vs. ZTO: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampEquifax Inc.ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014751700000534537000
Thursday, January 1, 2015884300000591738000
Friday, January 1, 2016948200000705995000
Sunday, January 1, 20171039100000780517000
Monday, January 1, 201812133000001210717000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919902000001546227000
Wednesday, January 1, 202013225000001663712000
Friday, January 1, 202113246000001875869000
Saturday, January 1, 202213289000002077372000
Sunday, January 1, 202313857000002425253000
Monday, January 1, 20241450500000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: Equifax Inc. vs. ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.

In the competitive world of business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Equifax Inc. and ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. have shown contrasting trends in their SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Equifax's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 84%, while ZTO Express saw a staggering increase of around 354%. This significant difference highlights ZTO's rapid expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. However, Equifax's more stable growth suggests a focus on efficiency and cost control. By 2023, ZTO's SG&A expenses were about 75% higher than Equifax's, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into how these companies prioritize operational efficiency and growth, offering lessons for businesses aiming to optimize their own SG&A costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025