Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Waste Management, Inc. vs Thomson Reuters Corporation

Cost Efficiency: Waste Management vs. Thomson Reuters

__timestampThomson Reuters CorporationWaste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201492090000009002000000
Thursday, January 1, 201588100000008231000000
Friday, January 1, 201682320000008486000000
Sunday, January 1, 201780790000009021000000
Monday, January 1, 201841310000009249000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201924310000009496000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202022690000009341000000
Friday, January 1, 2021247800000011111000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022240800000012294000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023409500000012606000000
Monday, January 1, 202413383000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Tale of Two Giants: Cost Efficiency in Revenue

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding cost efficiency is paramount. Waste Management, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation, two titans in their respective industries, offer a fascinating study in contrasts over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Waste Management, Inc. consistently demonstrated robust cost efficiency, with its cost of revenue peaking at approximately 12.6 billion in 2023, marking a 40% increase from 2014. In contrast, Thomson Reuters Corporation saw a significant decline, with its cost of revenue dropping by over 55% during the same period, reaching a low of around 2.4 billion in 2022. This divergence highlights Waste Management's steady growth and operational efficiency, while Thomson Reuters appears to have streamlined its operations, possibly reflecting strategic shifts or market challenges. As we delve deeper into these trends, the data underscores the importance of strategic cost management in maintaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025